.svg)
INTRODUCING: AIStor Tables with native Iceberg Support. Learn More ↗
WEBINAR: Join MinIO, Carahsoft, and H20.ai—On-Prem Sovereign AI for Government Agencies Register ↗
A CI/CD pipeline is an automated series of steps that moves software from code change through build, test, and deployment to production. This automation transforms how development teams deliver software by replacing manual handoffs with continuous integration and delivery processes that catch errors early and accelerate release cycles.
Modern software development demands speed and reliability simultaneously, which creates tension between moving fast and maintaining quality. CI/CD pipelines resolve this tension by automating the repetitive work of building, testing, and deploying code while enforcing consistent standards across every release.
A CI/CD pipeline is an automated series of steps that moves software from a developer's code change all the way to production. The pipeline automates building, testing, and deploying code by removing manual handoffs and reducing errors. This automation is what makes modern software development fast and reliable.
The term "CI/CD" actually covers two practices. Continuous Integration (CI) means developers regularly merge their code changes into a shared repository, where automated builds and tests run immediately. The "CD" part has two meanings: continuous delivery, where code is automatically prepared for release but requires human approval before going live, or continuous deployment, where passing code deploys to production automatically without any manual gate.
When you commit code to a version control system like Git, the pipeline kicks off automatically. It runs through predefined stages (build, test, deploy) without anyone needing to manually trigger each step. Think of it like an assembly line: code enters at one end, passes through quality checkpoints, and comes out production ready at the other end.
This workflow reflects DevOps principles by connecting development and operations teams through shared, automated processes. Instead of developers throwing code over a wall to operations, everyone works with the same pipeline that enforces consistent standards.
Version control systems form the foundation of CI/CD. Developers work on feature branches without disrupting the main codebase. When they submit a pull request, the pipeline validates that new code integrates cleanly with existing work by checking for compilation errors, conflicts, and dependency problems.
This early validation catches integration issues while they're fresh in a developer's mind. Fixing a conflict immediately is far easier than tracking down why something broke weeks later.
The build stage compiles source code and packages it into artifacts: versioned bundles like Docker images or executable packages. Organizations store multiple versions of artifacts in repositories, which allows teams to deploy specific versions or roll back when problems surface.
After building, code moves through test environments that increasingly resemble production. Each environment validates the code under more realistic conditions before the final deployment stage pushes changes live.
Continuous integration emphasizes frequent code merges (often multiple times daily) into a shared branch. Each merge triggers automated builds and tests that verify the code compiles and passes basic checks. This practice surfaces errors quickly, when they're easiest to fix.
Early detection matters because small problems caught immediately don't compound into larger issues. A syntax error found in minutes beats a production bug discovered weeks later.
Continuous delivery automates everything up to production but includes a manual approval before final release. This approach works well when business stakeholders coordinate releases with marketing campaigns or when regulatory requirements demand human oversight before deployment.
Continuous deployment removes that final manual step. Code that passes all tests deploys automatically and quickly after a commit. This maximizes delivery speed but demands robust testing and monitoring to maintain reliability.
Testing automation provides the quality control that makes CI/CD reliable. Pipelines typically run multiple test types at different stages:
Automated checks assess performance, API behavior, and security comprehensively. The continuous feedback loop helps teams catch and fix issues before they reach production.
Automation accelerates every stage of delivery. With continuous deployment, changes can go live rapidly after passing tests. This rapid iteration lets teams respond quickly to user feedback and market demands by delivering features and fixes at a pace manual processes can't match.
The speed advantage compounds over time. Small improvements delivered frequently create more value than large releases delivered sporadically.
Frequent automated testing catches defects early, when they're easier and cheaper to fix. The 2019 DORA State of DevOps Report measured performance across thousands of organizations and found that top performing teams using continuous integration deploy code 208 times more frequently and recover from incidents 2,604 times faster than their lowest performing counterparts.
The pipeline enforces consistent quality standards across all code changes, preventing problematic code from advancing. Automated rollback capabilities enhance reliability by quickly reverting changes when issues emerge. This systematic quality control reduces downtime and improves user experience.
Pipelines create shared visibility into the development process. Everyone sees which changes are in progress, what's being tested, and what's ready for production. This transparency improves coordination between development and operations, reducing friction and miscommunication.
Automation also frees developers from repetitive deployment tasks. Instead of managing manual releases, they focus on writing code and solving complex problems.
The CI/CD ecosystem includes numerous tools with different strengths. Jenkins remains widely used as an open source CI server with extensive plugin support. Cloud native options like GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CD, CircleCI, and Travis CI offer tight integration with their platforms. Cloud providers offer their own solutions: AWS CodePipeline and GCP Cloud Build integrate with their respective ecosystems.
Container based workflows often pair CI/CD pipelines with Kubernetes for container orchestration. While Kubernetes isn't a CI/CD tool itself, it manages the deployment and scaling of containerized applications across hybrid cloud environments after the pipeline packages them into container images.
Selecting CI/CD tools requires evaluating several factors. Consider your existing infrastructure: tools that integrate with your current version control and cloud platforms reduce implementation complexity. Scalability matters too; your solution handles current workloads while accommodating future growth.
Ease of use affects adoption rates. Tools with intuitive interfaces and good documentation help teams get productive quickly, while support options and community resources provide assistance when challenges arise.
AI and machine learning workflows introduce complexity beyond traditional software development. Models require large datasets for training, and datasets evolve over time. Data versioning becomes critical: tracking which data trained which model version ensures reproducibility.
AI/ML pipelines must handle distinct workload patterns. Model training often demands substantial compute and storage capacity, while inference workloads prioritize low latency. These different requirements mean pipelines need infrastructure that adapts to both training and production phases.
Effective pipelines depend on reliable data infrastructure. Artifacts, test data, logs, and deployment packages all require storage that's both scalable and performant. As pipelines run continuously, storage systems handle high throughput without becoming bottlenecks.
Data availability and durability matter particularly for data intensive applications. Lost artifacts or corrupted test data disrupt the entire pipeline, delaying releases and complicating troubleshooting.
Well designed pipelines are modular and reusable. Breaking pipelines into discrete stages (build, test, deploy) makes them easier to understand and maintain. Treating pipeline configuration as code enables version control and collaborative improvement.
Start simple and iterate. A basic pipeline that automates builds and core tests provides immediate value. You can add complexity (additional test types, deployment environments, approval gates) as your team gains experience.
Security practices evolved into DevSecOps as organizations adopted cloud platforms, microservices, containers, and DevOps workflows, creating a bottleneck where traditional security approaches couldn't keep pace with rapid release cycles. Modern pipelines incorporate automated security checks and testing to prevent vulnerabilities and enforce policy compliance. Secrets management (handling API keys, passwords, and credentials securely) prevents unauthorized access.
Access controls limit who can trigger deployments or modify pipeline configurations. This governance ensures code is thoroughly vetted before reaching production while maintaining audit trails for compliance requirements.
Pipeline performance directly affects development velocity. Monitor build times, test durations, and success rates to identify bottlenecks. While CI/CD automation accelerates the build and deployment stages, LinearB Labs found the average cycle time is about 7 days, with code sitting in PR review for 5 of those days. This data suggests that human processes, not just automated pipeline execution, contribute significantly to delivery delays. Optimizing your pipeline's technical performance matters, and addressing review bottlenecks and approval workflows can also improve overall velocity. Failed builds should provide clear diagnostic information, helping developers quickly understand and fix problems without adding further delays.
Continuous optimization keeps pipelines running efficiently. Parallel test execution, caching dependencies, and incremental builds all reduce cycle times. Regular reviews help teams refine processes and adopt new practices.
Modern development teams need storage infrastructure that keeps pace with continuous delivery workflows: scalable capacity for artifacts and test data, high throughput for rapid builds and deployments, and reliability to support always on automation.
Request a free trial to explore how high-performance object storage can strengthen your CI/CD foundation.
