This guide explains what disaggregated storage is, how it differs from traditional and hyperconverged approaches, why it matters for modern AI workloads, and the practical considerations for implementation.
Disaggregated storage separates storage resources from compute resources and connects them over high-speed network fabrics, allowing organizations to scale each independently based on actual workload demands. Instead of bundling compute and storage in fixed-ratio nodes, this architecture breaks that coupling—you add storage capacity without adding compute power, or scale compute without touching storage. This addresses a fundamental limitation of traditional storage systems: the forced coupling that leads to overprovisioning, resource waste, and inflexibility as AI and analytics workloads scale.
Disaggregated storage architectures separate storage and compute into independent resource pools connected through high-speed network fabrics. Traditional coupled systems force you to scale storage and compute together—adding storage means buying compute you don't need, and vice versa. Disaggregated architectures eliminate this constraint. Scale storage capacity independently when data volumes grow. Scale compute power independently when processing demands increase.
This architectural separation directly addresses the resource imbalance inherent in AI and analytics workloads. Data volumes typically grow faster than processing requirements. Independent scaling delivers the cost efficiency and performance these workloads demand without the waste of overprovisioned resources.
Traditional storage models like SAN and NAS tightly couple storage capacity with processing power in fixed configurations. When you need more storage, you often have to add compute resources you don't need, or you're forced to upgrade entire appliances in expensive tiers. This creates waste and drives up costs.
Disaggregated storage treats storage and compute as separate resource pools. If your AI training pipeline needs more storage capacity but compute is sufficient, you add storage nodes without touching your compute infrastructure. This flexibility eliminates the overprovisioning that plagues traditional architectures.
Multimodal generative AI systems process vast unstructured datasets where metadata processing, storage tasks, and capacity requirements grow at different rates. With training data doubling every nine to ten months, traditional tightly coupled storage architectures struggle to scale these elements efficiently. This forces organizations to overprovision resources and drive up costs unnecessarily.
HCI brought significant management simplicity, but its node-based scaling proves rigid when storage and compute needs diverge. Organizations find themselves either starved for storage capacity with excess compute, or paying for compute power they can't use because they needed more storage. AI workloads amplify this problem because training and inference phases have fundamentally different resource profiles.
Data-intensive workloads like AI training, real-time analytics, and large-scale simulations generate and consume massive amounts of data at high velocities. Cloud-native and hybrid environments particularly benefit from disaggregated architectures because they support dynamic resource allocation. Workloads access exactly the storage performance and capacity they need without being constrained by fixed infrastructure ratios.
The primary advantage is the ability to scale storage and compute independently for more efficient resource use and dynamic allocation. When your data volumes grow but processing requirements remain stable, you add storage capacity without purchasing unnecessary compute nodes. When you need more processing power for inference workloads, you scale compute without adding storage you don't need.
This independent scaling directly addresses the overprovisioning problem that drives up infrastructure costs. You can right-size each resource pool to match actual workload requirements.
Modern AI and analytics workloads are rarely static. Training phases demand high storage throughput and capacity, while inference phases prioritize compute with lower storage requirements. Disaggregated architectures let you reallocate resources dynamically as workload characteristics change.
A single disaggregated storage pool can serve AI training jobs, analytics queries, and backup operations concurrently, with each workload accessing the storage performance it needs without interfering with others.
Disaggregated storage improves overall resource utilization by eliminating the forced coupling of storage and compute. In enterprise environments, this translates to:
You avoid discarding functional hardware to move to the next capacity tier. Instead, you incrementally add exactly what you need when you need it.
Disaggregated storage depends on high-speed, low-latency connectivity between compute and storage resources. The network becomes a critical component rather than an afterthought. Organizations typically need to invest in high-performance interconnects like RDMA, NVMe-over-Fabrics, or similar technologies to achieve viable performance levels.
Your network fabric needs sufficient bandwidth and redundancy to prevent bottlenecks. Modern high-speed interconnects like RDMA and NVMe-over-Fabrics deliver the performance disaggregated architectures require. Software-defined networking simplifies management as you scale storage and compute independently, giving you the flexibility to adjust each resource pool without reconfiguring your entire infrastructure.
While disaggregated architectures require thoughtful planning, modern implementations prioritize operational simplicity. Key considerations include:
Modern disaggregated storage solutions address these considerations through automation and software-defined approaches. Unlike legacy systems, they're designed to scale with minimal administrative burden. You can add nodes without complex reconfiguration or manual intervention.
Many enterprises operate mixed environments with legacy SAN/NAS systems alongside newer storage technologies. Integrating disaggregated storage with existing infrastructure and applications can present challenges, particularly for workloads designed around traditional storage assumptions.
A phased approach often works best. Many organizations augment existing storage with new high-performance clusters specifically for AI and analytics workloads, rather than attempting wholesale replacement. This lets them preserve traditional platforms for transactional and VM workloads while using disaggregated storage for high-bandwidth AI training and analytics.
Start by assessing your workload's bandwidth and latency requirements. AI training workloads typically demand high throughput with moderate latency tolerance, while inference workloads prioritize low latency. Your network fabric delivers sufficient bandwidth and redundancy to support peak demand without becoming a bottleneck.
RDMA-based protocols can deliver significantly lower latency than traditional TCP/IP by bypassing the CPU and operating system kernel. NVMe-over-Fabrics provides direct access to NVMe storage devices across the network, reducing overhead and improving performance.
AI and analytics workloads benefit from storage systems optimized for high-throughput sequential operations and efficient metadata handling. Configure your disaggregated storage to deliver the sustained bandwidth training jobs require, recognizing that these workloads often read and write massive datasets continuously.
Match your storage architecture to your use case. Focus on whether vendors offer disaggregation between hosts and storage or within the storage system itself, and how each approach aligns with your specific workload patterns.
Implement robust data protection mechanisms within your disaggregated architecture. Erasure coding provides efficient protection against drive and node failures without the storage overhead of full replication. For disaster recovery, consider active-active replication to geographically separate sites.
Your storage system detects failures, reconstructs lost data, and restores system health without manual intervention. This resilience becomes particularly important in always-on AI and analytics environments where downtime directly impacts operations.
The storage industry continues to evolve toward greater disaggregation as networking technologies advance. High-speed, low-latency fabrics make the separation of storage and compute increasingly practical, while software-defined approaches provide the flexibility to deploy across diverse infrastructure.
NVMe-over-Fabrics and similar technologies are becoming mainstream, enabling storage disaggregation with performance that rivals or exceeds traditional direct-attached storage.
Kubernetes and container-based architectures accelerate disaggregated storage adoption by treating infrastructure as pools of resources rather than fixed configurations. Cloud-native paradigms align naturally with disaggregation's separation of concerns, where storage, compute, and networking are independent layers orchestrated by software.
Organizations building cloud-native applications increasingly expect storage to behave like other cloud resources: elastic, software-defined, and independently scalable. This expectation drives demand for disaggregated architectures that can deliver cloud-like flexibility in private, hybrid, and public cloud environments.
Ready to modernize your data infrastructure with high-performance, disaggregated object storage? MinIO AIStor delivers the scalability, performance, and flexibility your AI and analytics workloads demand. Request a free trial to experience how software-defined, S3-compatible object storage can transform your storage architecture.
